The Reform Plan Of Income Distribution Was Postponed To &Nbsp; Experts Suggested Learning From Japan.

Originally scheduled for publication in the year. General plan of income distribution reform Still will Suspension, When the time comes, it will still be arranged by the State Council. Yang Yiyong, director of the sociology institute of the national development and Reform Commission, has discussed the draft plan.

Before the final decision was made, the State Council still solicited opinions from all levels. The experience of some leading countries is also concerned. In December 21st, the China Development Research Foundation of the State Council Development Research Center held a special remote video conference. Japan Itou Masano, Professor of economics, University of Tokyo.

Recently, Professor Ito was commissioned to complete the 91 volume edition of the national income doubling plan.

In the conference discussion session, Chinese scholars believe that Japan's meticulous means such as the program demonstration model before the introduction of the national income doubling plan and the assessment in the process, and so on, to enhance the years of schooling as a solution to the supply difficulties of the labor market and so on, are all the lessons we can learn. At the same time, we need to work harder to break monopoly and restrict government expenditure.

According to Lu Mai, Secretary General of the China Development Research Foundation, the relevant discussions will be submitted to the decision-making level for reference.

　　 Adjust the total volume or adjust the structure?

Chi Fulin, President of the China (Hainan) reform and Development Research Institute, recently made clear that China urgently needs to take income distribution reform as a binding index, striving for "12th Five-Year" income growth rate of urban and rural residents not less than 8%, and the average annual growth rate of laborers' remuneration is not less than 10%.

"According to this estimate, the income of Chinese labourers will double in about 10 years. If the reform of income distribution policy is doubled, it will double in five years, similar to Japan's national income doubling plan." Chi Fulin said.

Su Hainan, vice president of the China Labour Association and chairman of the remuneration Specialized Committee, has repeatedly appealed to learn from Japan's experience and launch the national income doubling plan in China. "If the average annual wage growth is more than 15%, it will double in five years".

Some places began to pilot. In September this year, the Guangdong provincial development and Reform Commission "report on the implementation of expanding domestic demand in our province" pointed out that the "national income doubling plan" will be actively explored in the future.

Wei Ning, Vice Minister of macroeconomic research of the State Council Development Research Center, reminded that "the growth of gross national income is not equal to the growth of ordinary people's income. We also need to adjust the internal structure of national income and eliminate unfair distribution of income between different groups and different units.

At the practical level, as governments everywhere have been accustomed to the economic indicators of GDP and fiscal revenue, experts worry that a general increase in national income will allow local governments to pursue aggregate growth rather than the adjustment of specific income distribution structure.

In fact, the draft "12th Five-Year plan" published recently is also true. Recently, the main indicators of Guangxi, Heilongjiang, Guizhou and other provinces are still stuck in the economy, such as "strive to achieve a doubling of gross domestic product in 2010 than in 2010, and fiscal revenue more than doubled", which rarely touch on specific population income indicators.

In Japan's annual doubling plan, indicators such as GDP, gross national income, and wage doubling of specific groups were all involved.

Liu Wei, a researcher at the Ministry of Finance Research Institute, is worried that after simply raising the income multiplier plan, he will not be able to get around the targets.

"Instead of focusing on some of the indicators around the plan, it is better to face our core issues in the field of initial distribution". She believes that the most important thing for the government to do is to reduce interference and distortion in the market mechanism. {page_break}

　 How to make Japanese plans

According to Ito, he had worked hard and worked hard in the formulation and preparation stage of the national income doubling plan.

In 1959, the Japanese cabinet put forward the topic of income doubling plan to the Japanese economic symposium, which was specifically responsible by the general department, and set up two small committees to finalize the basic framework of the national income doubling plan.

A small Policy Research Committee will be set up under the committee to set specific indicators for economic or social development. Once GNP and other basic objectives are clear, the four departments of the government public sector research association, the private sector research association and the Metrology Department will be responsible for the promotion.

Among them, the government sector research association and the private sector research association are the two core committees, which are divided into 17 small committees, such as investment allocation, transportation, housing policy, water conservancy, energy, technology, education and training, social security committee and so on.

These committees are not responsible for project approval. They only propose sub area measures, determine how to allocate investment, and finally summarize the overall plan.

After the implementation of the policy, there are follow-up forces to follow up. Ito introduced that the policy makers and researchers at that time found that the target of the planned national income plan deviate from the actual situation, and the economic growth rate is too high, which is worried that the Japanese economy will be out of balance.

The specific way is to set up a number of sub committees in the economic deliberations, such as prices, labor, industrial structure, social capital, national economy, finance and finance, and so on.

Wei Jian pointed out that such a categorized argument model is more effective than simply "facing the society for Soliciting Opinions". At the same time, the policy making and demonstration department is not specifically responsible for project approval, and their appeal is relatively detached.

　 Educational effort

In Japan's national income doubling plan, "improving human capacity" has been one of the key points, which focuses on the continuous delivery of high-quality labor force and the continuous cooperation of compulsory education.

As a measure, Ito introduced that in 60s of last century, every prefecture and county university in Japan set up a Ministry of engineering to help students learn new equipment and new technologies, set up research institutes in various enterprises, train technicians and managers, and expand the number of high school enrolment in education, and some five year high schools also train backbone technicians.

Zhao Jinping, Vice Minister of Ministry of Foreign Economic Research of the development research center of the State Council, according to his research, found that "compulsory education in high school in Japan has delayed the entry of labor force into the market for three or four years, and there is no household registration restriction in the cross regional mobility of labor force, thus bringing about a fair starting point for all kinds of employees, thus ensuring the fair level of wages and salaries."

Ito's words have also been corroborated. He said that in those days, Japan absorbed a large number of workers in various emerging industrial fields, and the rate of enrollment increased rapidly. After 1970s, the number of high school graduates reached 100%, and the 4 year university reached 25%.

The development of industry and the general improvement of education level have brought about the narrowing of workers' income gap. Ito introduced that in 1955, the wages of the medium-sized enterprises were half of the wages of the large enterprises. By 1975, the wages of the small and medium-sized enterprises began to be close to that of the large enterprises, which was 90% of that of the latter.